BLUF: The ATF is trying to redefine the mechanics of the Forced Reset Trigger (FRT) as a machine gun, but their argument faces challenges. The ongoing legal battle involves interpretations of past court decisions, and the outcome is still uncertain.
The ATF is in a legal tussle over the classification of the Forced Reset Trigger (FRT). They argue the FRT acts like a machine gun. This claim suggests that a single trigger pull fires multiple shots. Many experts disagree with this assessment. They explain that an FRT still requires a separate trigger pull for each shot. The FRT only speeds up the process. It still sticks to the definition of a semi-automatic.
The Supreme Court’s Cargill decision is crucial in this case. The ATF says this decision should not affect the FRT case. They argue that bump stocks and FRTs are different. But in the Cargill case, the Court ruled against the ATF’s stance on bump stocks. The Fifth Circuit mechanically struck down the ATF’s rule. They found that bump stocks did not match the definition of a machine gun. This could weaken the ATF’s argument against the FRT.
Rare Breed, the company behind the FRT, is involved in the legal proceedings. They are set to respond to the ATF’s brief soon. The National Association for Gun Rights (NAGR) is also a key player in this case. For now, the rule against the FRT is blocked. The ATF must return all seized FRTs by February 22nd. An ongoing appeal adds another layer of complexity to the situation.
Observers are keenly watching the case to see how it unfolds. The legal decisions made here could have significant implications. They might affect how certain gun modifications are regulated in the future.
The case highlights broader debates over gun control and definitions. It raises questions about how laws are interpreted and enforced. As new developments occur, they will offer more insight into the legal landscape surrounding firearms and accessories.
- Eighth Circuit Court Strikes Down ATF’s Pistol Brace Rule as Arbitrary - December 20, 2024
- Federal Judge Strikes Down ATF’s Force Reset Trigger Restrictions - December 18, 2024
- Supreme Court declines emergency intervention in NYC gun permit case - December 16, 2024
