Ninth Circuit Rehears En Banc on Gun Rights in Duarte Felony Case

The case of United States of America versus Duarte, also known as "Shorty," is getting a lot of attention. This case could change how courts handle the law stopping felons from having firearms. This law is under 18 USC 922 G. Many district courts have upheld this law, but the Ninth Circuit recently looked at it differently.

Shorty was convicted in the United States District Court. He challenged this conviction, saying it was unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. He argued that just having a felony shouldn't take away the right to have a firearm. This is based on the Bruen decision, which deals with gun rights.

The Ninth Circuit court agreed with Shorty. They said that 922 G is unconstitutional as applied to him. They reversed his conviction. This decision was exciting for Shorty and many others watching the case.

Gavel on wooden desk in courtroom with American flag in background symbolizing justice and law in the United States.

But things are not finished yet. The Ninth Circuit decided to rehear the case with more judges. This is called an en banc hearing. It means the entire court will look at the case again. This can change the decision that was made by the smaller panel.

This case may go all the way to the Supreme Court. It challenges how we view the rights of felons under the Second Amendment. The outcome could affect many people and cases across the country.

The Ninth Circuit's decision highlights the ongoing debate about gun rights and public safety. It shows how courts are rethinking laws based on new interpretations. The case will be closely watched as it moves forward.

For now, Shorty and others wait to see what will happen next. The decision could change how the law views the rights of people with felony convictions. This case is important and may set a precedent for future cases. The legal world is watching to see if this is the case that makes it to the Supreme Court and possibly changes the law.

Gun Law Media